Poker superstar Phil Ivey has received preliminary approval for a vegas medical marijuana dispensary license in Nevada.
Phil Ivey isn’t smoking one thing, but his future clients may be: Ivey received one of 26 preliminary license approvals for the medical marijuana dispensary through the vegas City Council earlier this week, potentially making the poker superstar one of the primary operators into the city to offer pot to consumers.
You can find even more steps necessary before Ivey gets last approval to start such a business, but his approval does mean that the city found him qualified to go on in the licensing procedure.
This week to plead their cases for medical marijuana licenses about 50 potential operators went before the City Council. Those that got preliminary approval from the city will now have to be approved by the state health division.
The City Council will ultimately hold a last suitability conference for the people approved by the state before awarding a limited number of licenses which have been set aside for Las Vegas.
This means that Ivey still has a way that is long go before getting a last go-ahead to dispense medical cannabis in Sin City. But as he makes pot-sized bets at the poker table if he can make his way through the various licensing stages, Ivey might end up slinging weed just as prolifically.
Council Separate on Licensing Process
There has been a whole lot of debate over the way vegas has handled the pot licensing process, though that has more related to procedural questions than any such thing Ivey or virtually any potential licensee has done.
Councilman Bob Coffin introduced a motion to delay the proceedings until after Nevada regulators weigh in regarding the suitability of each of the candidates next week. He worried that making opinions that are public applicants before the state made its own guidelines could possibly lead to lawsuits, and that waiting could allow the city to approach the issue with an ‘unbiased eye.’
But that motion ultimately failed, as a vote on the issue finished in a tie that is 3-3. Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian and councilman Ricki Barlow also voted to wait the proceedings, while Mayor Carolyn Goodman, spouse of infamous ex-mayor Oscar and mother of an applicatant herself, abstained from the vote.
Among the numerous applicants that were approved were developer James Hammer, restaurant owner Michael Morton, and consultant that is political Thomas. Nuleaf, a Las Vegas-based company that is owned by a team that operates dispensaries in California, had been denied for a license.
‘we believe waiting could have made a difference,’ Nuleaf spokesman Bradley Mayer said. ‘We feel confident that the state will find we have been a very qualified applicant.’
Ivey Headliner regarding the Year
That is just the newest in a string of headlines made by Ivey which have nothing at all to do with his prodigious abilities at the poker table.
Perhaps the biggest headlines are made in his various cases that are edge-sorting Crockfords and the Borgata. Ivey currently destroyed the Crockfords instance in the united kingdom’s tall Court of Justice, costing him over $12 million in winnings. a similar instance against the Atlantic City casino is still pending, although in that case, it’s the casino that is pursuing recourse to have its payouts returned. Ivey contends that the techniques he found in the games don’t represent cheating, while the gambling enterprises, perhaps not interestingly, disagree.
Last Saturday, Ivey also shut down the Ivey Poker website, closing operations just 18 months after the Facebook poker program launched. However, the poker legend said that the closed down had been simply a change for the product.
Southern Africa Online Gambling Ban Stirs Debate
South Africa is considering a ban on online gambling, in addition to stronger regulations for land-based wagering, such as electronic bingo terminals like these. (Image: OnlineCasinoArchives.co.za)
South Africa’s government is proposing a ban on a wide variety of gambling activities, including all forms of online gambling and other activities such as dog racing. That proposition is being discussed by the National Gambling Policy Council, which features people from both the national and governments that are provincial as well as the Department of Trade and Industry.
According to department officials, the government believes it has the capability to enforce laws on gambling, and that it’s unclear how jobs that are many created by the internet gambling industry. It might additionally barely be a move that is unprecedented as much other jurisdictions across the world have outlawed online gambling within the past.
Democratic Alliance Favors Regulation Over Ban
But while many government officials were enthusiastic concerning the prospect, the idea of a ban that is outright highly denounced by the opposition Democratic Alliance.
‘That is a very, very decision that is bad’ stated DA trade and industry spokesperson Geordin Hill-Lewis. ‘I fiercely disagree with that view. It really is completely shortsighted to say that it is better for South Africans to not be permitted to gamble online if you find demand that is patently significant the country to achieve that. It is for government to facilitate that within the way that is safest possible.’
The DA position is that online gambling is better controlled through regulation, rather than an outright ban in other words. a ban that is full Hill-Lewis said, would cost far an excessive amount of in resources to enforce.
But Department of Trade slot machine game quick hits and Industry Deputy Director-General Zodwa Ntuli said that the precise circumstances in South Africa meant that a ban would be good policy that is public. She pointed out that the department’s proposal was made after recognizing that South Africa had a level that is relatively high of gambling and debt contrasted with many countries.
Electronic Bingo Terminals Will Be Limited
If the department’s recommendations had been to be law, it wouldn’t trigger a widespread ban of all gambling activities in the nation, but would rather restrict what is allowed for the conventional forms of gaming which can be already present in South Africa. There would also be further controls put on electronic bingo terminals, which are presently allowed by provincial governments, despite the fact that there is no policy that is national the devices.
That conflict caused Trade and Industry Minister Rob Davies to issue a moratorium on any further licenses for the machines. The recommendations that are new view a cap on the number of machines allowed nationwide. It would also try to get a grip on the simplicity of access to these machines, with officials saying that gambling must not be allowed in stores, for instance.
The newest regulations would have a framework for allowing the government to better oversee the horse racing industry. While few details were available, it appeared that probably the most significant changes there would come in the issuing of licenses, a process through which the federal government could influence change on the market.
Gambling regulation in Southern Africa is comparable to that for the usa and Canada, at minimum in terms of the interplay between federal and governments that are local. While the government that is federal national policy, it is up to individual provinces to decide how each will issue licenses and collect revenues from gambling tasks.
Massachusetts Casino Repeal Vote Happens Tuesday
Despite long odds, anti-casino forces remain hoping for a success in Massachusetts. A ‘yes’ vote means ‘no casinos’. (Image: Repeal the Casino Deal)
A vote that will either lead to Massachusetts casino repeal or to the matter being put to sleep once and for all is coming on Tuesday, though it would take a major upset for anti-casino advocates to get their way on Election Day. Those seeking to defeat casinos are confusingly looking for voters to vote ‘Yes’ on Question 3, an idea that will put a final end to the 2012 law that is allowing the state to license gaming houses throughout the state.
According to the survey that is latest by the Western New England University Polling Institute, 59 % of likely voters into the state plan to vote ‘No’ in the ballot question, meaning ‘yes’ to legal casinos. Just 35 % plan to vote ‘yes,’ in benefit of the repeal. Those figures represent a major gain for pro-casino forces, since a September poll showed just an 11 percent advantage for ‘no’ voters.
Of course, that’s assuming voters don’t get completely bewildered by the unintuitive ‘yes/no’ phrasing of the ballot effort itself.
Religious Voters Support Repeal
The numbers show that there is some success in efforts by religious leaders to get parishioners to oppose the casino law, with regular churchgoers being more inclined to vote ‘yes’ than their counterparts that are non-attending. But even Catholics whom attend mass every week are in opposition to repeal by way of a 17 % margin. In reality, Protestant voters who worship regularly make up about the only demographic that favor repeal, doing so by way of a 55-45 margin.
Meanwhile, the advertising efforts by casinos and their allies may actually have been very effective. Support for the repeal in Western Massachusetts has been reduced somewhat compared to in prior polls, maybe because of advertising that touted some great benefits of the planned MGM casino in Springfield.
Battle Over Pros and Consequences
But while anti-casino advocates may be dealing with odds that are long Tuesday, they’re nevertheless fighting in the final moments to get their message out. Teams like Repeal the Casino Deal believe that the casinos will offer you very little economic benefit to the folks of Massachusetts, while increasing unlawful activity and gambling addiction.
‘ The money isn’t visiting the people of Massachusetts,’ said Al Cabot, an anti-casino advocate. ‘This is in fact cash that’s going from one or two casinos in Connecticut to three casinos in Massachusetts.’
And in addition, those within the casino industry see things just a bit that is little. According to MGM Springfield President Mike Mathis, his business’s casino shall produce 1000s of jobs and bring tens of millions of dollars in economic stimulus to the city.
‘we have seen exactly what 25 years of no casino may do,’ Mathis said. ‘We’d like the opportunity.’
Mathis additionally disputes the concept that casinos would simply be taking money that is already spent in Massachusetts and shifting it to spending at his company’s resort.
‘A third of our customers are coming from Connecticut,’ Mathis said. ‘This concept that cash is falling through the sky or we’re cannibalizing the market that is local just inaccurate.’
Casinos in Massachusetts: Pre-Election Status
Therefore far, three licenses were awarded to create gambling venues in Massachusetts. Combined with the MGM casino in Springfield, Wynn Resorts was the champion of the higher Boston license, beating out a plan that is competing Mohegan Sun at Suffolk Downs in Revere. A license was additionally granted to Penn National to build a slots parlor in Plainridge.
While casino opponents may short come up at the polls, simply getting the question on the ballot was something of a victory. Although campaigners collected plenty of signatures to put the casino question up to a referendum, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley originally rejected the relevant question, forcing a showdown in their state’s Supreme Court over whether it could ultimately show up on this year’s ballot.